How do you follow up a Film so good and influential? Seriously, think about the 1980s in Film and a few obvious things come to mind. You've got Die Hard. You've got Predator. You've got St. Elmo's Fire. You've got Robocop.
So, again, how do you follow that up? Well, the answer is 'Not easily.' It took a number of Screenwriters and Directors before we finally got the finished product. In fact, we lost the previous Director right before the shoot. Irving Kirshner- the Director of The Empire Strikes Back (!) came in last minute and ended his Feature-Film Career with this.
The Plot involves OCP up to more bad things, Robocop trying to stop crime and, well, lots of shooting. This supposedly had the second-highest body count in Film that year, just beat out by Die Hard 2. Hey look- a callback...of sorts.
So why is the first one so beloved, the third one so ridiculed and this one...also existing? To find out, read on...
Future Detroit (or is it past now?) is worse than ever as the OCP is forcing a Police Strike and crime is rampant.He's conflicted, however, as he remembers his past and must decide whether he's Alex Murphy or just Robocop.
A criminal named Cain is ruining things with his new super-drug.
The corrupt Scientists at OCP mess with his programming to further exacerbate things in Detroit, leading a strange comedic bit where he's basically a parody of Robocop.
Will things be neatly-wrapped up?
Will the third one deal with the dangling Plot Threads?
A fun, if very muddled Film. Is this as good as Robocop? No. I mean, duh, right?
Next up, I stay in the same relative time period for a change. What happens when you watch a Film you sort of vaguely remember from 25-30 years ago? Stay tuned...
No comments:
Post a Comment