Long ago, I covered the original Amityville Horror Films. Is that due for a Compendium too?
In any event, I stumbled upon the original Book (actually 2 copies, but I only need 1).
It is pretty famous, so why not check it out?
It is time for another face-off between the written and visual mediums...
***VS***
What's the Same?
Both the Film and Book tell the tale of the Lutz Family in 112 Ocean Ave. They buy a House unaware of the recent murders...somehow.
Strange stuff starts to happen. Flies appear. George goes crazy.
In the End, they leave (and The Conjuring Series is somehow set up).
What's Different?
So if the Story Beats are the same, why bother with this?
Well, many MANY things were added or removed.
George goes crazy in the Book as he's always cold, confused by the dog's behavior and awoken at 3:15 am every morning.
In the Film, he's driven mad and compelled to try and kill his family!
This is not in the Book. The Remake added him killing the Dog (which led to a lawsuit).
The Book has weird stuff like a ceramic lion somehow moving (when nobody is watching) and somehow attacking George (which he doesn't see).
This is not in the Film.
The Babysitter Scene is only in the Film(s).
The Book implies that the House drove George to not shave, making him end up looking like Ronald DeFeo (who died in 2021).
The Film just has James Brolin with the beard from the get-go. Probably easier for a Film.
Curiously, the Book calls the Priest as 'Father Mancuso.'
The Film calls him Father Delaney.
He's made sick and eventually made blind by the evil forces.In the Book, he grows welts and feels sick all of the time.
In a random change, he always seems to be talking to Kathy and not George in the Film. I guess it is because George is just going crazy.
The Book's finale has George speaking in tongues, Kathy floating and other weird stuff. They leave.
An Epilogue says that people came in, felt sick...but otherwise saw nothing crazy.
Final Thoughts
The Book really tries to get you to relate to the Family. It also features lots of little details like random drawings of the House Layout at key points.
The Film really lays it on thick with George being driven crazy and erratic. It makes for a more interesting Film to have him be 'a villain,' whether he's in control or not.
The Book really pushes the idea that the Family must work together to survive. The Film is about the House making George into 'a new Ronald.'
What is Better?
The Book.
While the Film has big moments, I think the focus change is a misstep. Yep, I'm here telling you that a Classic Film that got 27 and 3/4 Sequels got it wrong.
Welcome to Film Blogging.
A Book that is full of third-hand accounts of fright and unprovable things. That said, it builds up dread and makes you feel for the Family more than the Film(s).